Change is Coming to NASA Space Launch

by Space Frontier Foundation on March 19, 2010

Change is coming to the US space program. At last! Real, dramatic and tangible change in both its effect and the course it will create in this nation’s future in space.

It is long past time for us to try something different, as what we have been doing in our human space program since Apollo has been a failure of epic proportions. And yet, some defend the status quo and are actually angry about the coming changes proposed by the Obama Administration. I find this amazing given the space agency’s track record over the last few decades. But then, if nothing else, our past experience with the government building and operating space launches has shown that to many, simply flying some stuff around in circles and creating jobs that do nothing to advance us in any direction is more important than succeeding in getting anywhere – so long as everyone agrees in the myth that they are going somewhere.

It is heretical to say it in many quarters, but unlike its astronomy and robotic exploration programs, the current NASA operated human spaceflight program has failed by any rational measure in almost every respect to achieve Any of the milestones put forth by those who sold them to the American people so long ago. The most glaring example of this failure to deliver in the area of transportation is totally unknown to the taxpaying public and often overlooked by the defenders of the old ways: The space shuttle system, glorious and impressive symbol of the space agency for so long is a complete failure when measured against its promised performance. Sold in the 1970s as being able to fly once a week and bring costs down to tens of dollars a pound, they have averaged around 5 flights a year…on good years. In the meantime NASA has tried and failed time after time to develop new space transportation systems, including the much heralded and disastrous X-33, which after a billion dollars of taxpayer funding was canceled, never to have even rolled out of the hangar.

The background of repeated failures by the government to build and operate its own Earth to LEO launch systems is what we must keep in mind when we judge the new commercial Earth to LEO space transportation plans being put forth by the White House and NASA. Frankly, as a long time skeptic regarding anything the NASA press office puts out when it comes to human spaceflight, I am not only impressed by the plan to hand over this role to commercial space firms, but am willing to allow myself just a hint of hope that if it can be successfully implemented (freeing the agency to pursue real space exploration) We may at last break out of the circular self gratification of our current space program and go somewhere – and more importantly be able to go there again and again and even stay if we want to (the key word being “we” as in not just NASA employees, but eventually the rest of us too!).

And yes, to do this NASA will have to make changes. Rather than seeing itself as the emperor of all things space, it will have to change how it views the zone from the Earth’s surface to LEO. The agency simply cannot get it right when it comes to trying to build its own launch systems in any economic sense, and it is time it stopped trying. The agency will have to step aside in this area that it long ago pioneered. It will no longer be its own trucking service for small package delivery to space. It will have to relinquish its role as its own taxi service to LEO and leave the driving to someone else. Instead this job will be given to privately funded New Space firms across the nation that are working on a variety of rocketships that could catapult us into the space frontier and global space leadership at a fraction of the cost of any new NASA system.

For example, California’s SPACEX from its creation through its first successful orbital flights and all the industrial tooling and facilities to support them spent far less than the $445 million NASA did on its recent smoke and mirrors alleged test flight of an Ares 1-X mock up to only 50k feet higher altitude than that achieved by parachutist Joe Kittinger in 1960. To get all the way to being able to carry humans in its Dragon capsule on its Falcon 9 will cost only a fraction of the projected cost of the Ares and Orion system – and almost more importantly, when not in use by NASA it will be used by commercial companies to carry their own payloads and customers into space. Orbital Sciences using its Taurus vehicle is in a similar position and projects similar cost savings over the as yet paper lion of Ares Orion.

Even if one isn’t willing to bet on NewSpace firms some of our largest traditional firms are moving ahead with plans to adapt their tried and true systems to carry payloads and people into orbit to serve commercial customers and even the ISS. For example, the Atlas V has flown some 20 times and Delta IV more than 10 which is about 20 times and 10 times more than Ares and the Boeing/Bigelow Crew Capsule now in development will cost a fraction of that needed for Orion and be usable by both the government and commercial customers. From now on, in a very real sense, NASA’s exploration job will no longer start at the launch pad, but begin in space itself.

But none of this will happen if NASA tries to manage these new players in its old way. NASA must change not just what it does and where it does it, but how it does what it does, and how it works with others that are doing the jobs it needs done. Agency managers will have to learn new ways of contracting that are based not on how much work is done on a project, but how much that work produces. Like the rest of us, as a customer it can no longer rationalize spending huge amounts of money paying for a failed effort to deliver a package to a destination, but only for success. Yes, the agency will need to set standards for the transportation of its employees to and from space, but these should not and cannot be any more stringent than those they set for let’s say their astronauts who fly in F-16s. And it will have to actually relinquish control over some other areas of space operations that have become somewhat mundane in return for being able to focus on what many used to see as its main mission – exploration, science and technology development.

Unfortunately, no matter how good (normal) all of this sounds to normal people who live in a free enterprise society, in the visionless and ironic land of old school government aerospace the pork must keep flowing and tradition will  fight innovation. The forces of darkness are already moving to crush the revolution right now, as those who do not understand the enormity of the promise in this change in Congress ally with those who do and want it stopped regardless, all well armed by those who have fed off the system for so long they forgot NASA’s job is exploring space and not the national wallet for their own ends.

And so the battle is joined. And in yet another dose of irony, many of us who for so long have been seen as the foes of the agency as we have fought for common sense will now be standing shoulder to shoulder with its new leaders. About time I say, as I have never enjoyed having to take on my childhood icon time after time as it has meandered far from the dream of exploring and opening space. And although I know this may be a brief moment in time, I take my hat (space helmet?) off to those who are working on the inside to make this happen, and pledge my keyboard to their defence in the coming months. I only hope they are willing to stand their ground as well, as the stakes are greater than simply who gets what contract for how much. What is at stake is the future of this nation in space and just how soon and how well that future is realized.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

 

banner2

Ted Cruz has been selected to oversee the Senate’s subcommittee on Space, Science, and
Competitiveness. Cruz’s past actions have resulted in government program cuts which have threatened NASA funding. Cruz however, being from Texas, still showed a strong support for NASA and its current missions in an interview with the Houston Chronicle.
 
The Verge
 
SpaceX continues to face adversity in obtaining the certification to launch U.S. military satellites. Following the historic lawsuit issued by SpaceX against the Air Force this past year, the company still stays firm in its ability to compete against United Launch Alliance (ULA) for military contracts under the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) Program. Officials in the Pentagon and Air Force continue to look to SpaceX as a future alternative due to ULAs higher costs and reliance on Russian Engines.
 
CNBC

“Focused on Settlement Policy for the NewSpace Citizens of the Universe.”

 

Newsletter Editors:

Joshua Jenkins

Andrew Newman

Calvin Baker

 

Contact us at:

joshua.jenkins@spacefrontier.org

andrew.newman@spacefrontier.org

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Space Is Hard – Cheap Access To Space Is Our Future

January 10, 2015

Space Is Hard – Cheap Access To Space Is Our Future Space Frontier Foundation Applauds Recent SpaceX Reusable Falcon 9 Effort   Silicon Valley, CA – Today’s Falcon 9 first-stage landing attempt marks an important step towards humanity’s future in space, thanks to Elon Musk and his company, Space Exploration Technologies. Space Frontier Foundation would […]

Read the full article →

Capitol Hill Policy Update for December 21st, 2014 through January 6th, 2015

January 10, 2015

Due to the potential of breaking news for 1/5/2015, the Capitol Hill Space Policy Update Newsletter’s release has been bumped to 1/6/2015 this week only. We appreciate your understanding.   Congress begins a new session on Tuesday, January 6th.    GAO Denies Sierra Nevada’s Protest Sierra Nevada filed a formal protest to GAO in early […]

Read the full article →

Capitol Hill Policy Update for December 8th through December 21st, 2014

January 10, 2015

(Left) Congressman John Culberson (R-TX) and  (Right) Congressman Adam Schiff (D-CA) Culberson and Schiff Push For Bipartisan Planetary Exploration Representatives John Culberson (R-TX) and Adam Schiff (D-CA) have been champions for NASA’s planetary science funding. Typically being a consideration for cuts in previous fiscal years, planetary science has seen significant increases in allocations. In recent […]

Read the full article →

Capitol Hill Policy Update for November 24th through December 8th, 2014

January 10, 2015

Justice Department Approves ATK – Orbital Sciences Merger The merger between ATK and Orbital Sciences has been approved by the Justice Department. The deal is expected to close February 2015.   GovConWire ESA Approves Ariane 6 The European Space Agency approved development of the new Ariane 6 rocket on December 2nd. The industry will accept […]

Read the full article →

Capitol Hill Policy Update for November 10th through November 24th, 2014

January 10, 2015

NASA and Blue Origin To Continue Advising Contract Until April 2016 NASA has extended the Commercial Crew Development round 2 contract with Blue Origin to provide technical expertise to the rising space company while not supplying financial resources. The CCDev2 program, in coordination with the Foundation’s vision, aimed to provide the incentives for private companies […]

Read the full article →

Capitol Hill Policy Update for October 27th through November 10th, 2014

January 10, 2015

Recent Orbital and Virgin Accidents The Foundation has confidence that the commercial spaceflight industry will be able to move forward after the recent failure of Orb-3 and the SpaceShipTwo tragedy. The hope is that Congress allows the NTSB to finish their investigation before taking any action on the subject. Passing new regulations on impulse could do much more harm […]

Read the full article →

Capitol Hill Policy Update for October 13th through October 27th, 2014

January 10, 2015

Boeing and SpaceX Moving Forward With Commercial Contracts Last Wednesday, a court ruled against Sierra Nevada Corporation’s claims against NASA concerning the $6.8 Billion allocated to SpaceX and Boeing last month for commercial crew vehicle development. The Government Accountability Office will still acknowledge SNC’s protest up until January 5th while the two awardees will be […]

Read the full article →

Capitol Hill Policy Update for September 28th through October 13th, 2014

January 10, 2015

  ____________________________________________________   Congress is currently OUT of session. ____________________________________________________   Commercial Crew Transportation Delayed, Restarted On October 2nd, NASA directed Boeing and SpaceX to halt all work with regards to Commercial Crew transportation Capabilities (CCtCAP). This was in response to Sierra Nevada filing a protest to the Government Accountability Office. A week later, NASA […]

Read the full article →

NewSpace News #116 – January 2015

January 8, 2015

India Closer To Manned Flight Currently, only 3 nations have the capability to send humans to space, and now India is a step closer to joining the ranks of space elites. India has successfully tested its new Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle Mark 3 (GSLV-3) and its 3-person crew capsule prototype. The flight was suborbital, and […]

Read the full article →